Blogs

Trademark Infringement Case Study: Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd vs Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd.

Trademark Infringement Case Study: Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd  vs  Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd.

Introduction

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. (Plaintiff)

Trademark Dispute India
This image represents the trademark infringement dispute in Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. vs. Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. is the parent company of Himalaya Wellness worldwide. It owns the trademarks & patents of Himalaya Wellness, which offers scientifically validated herbal solutions for the entire family. Himalaya is known for its trusted, head-to-heel wellness products rooted in Ayurveda & modern science.

Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. (Defendant)

Trademark Law India
The case demonstrates how trademark owners can safeguard their reputation, prevent consumer confusion, and enforce exclusive rights under trademark law.

Rajasthan Aushdhalaya is a renowned Ayurvedic brand, known for formulating, supplying, and exporting a wide range of herbal products. Using quality ingredients from trusted sources, their formulations are crafted to meet diverse wellness needs while staying true to traditional healing practices.

Case Summary

Case Overview

  • Case Title: Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. & Anr. vs Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
  • Court: Delhi High Court
  • Issue: Trademark infringement of ‘Liv.52’ & passing off using similar marks like ‘Liv-333’

Background

  • Himalaya adopted the ‘Liv.52’ mark for liver care products in 1955 & gained massive goodwill over the years.
  • Defendants were found selling ‘Liv-333liver care products using a logo & style allegedly similar to Himalaya’s.
  • Plaintiffs issued a cease-and-desist notice, but defendants continued the use.
Brand Protection
It offers valuable insights for businesses, legal professionals, and entrepreneurs on the significance of strong trademark protection and intellectual property strategy.
  • Wordmark: LIV . 52
  • Proprietor: HIMALAYA GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.
  • Application Number: 180564
  • Class / Classes: 5
  • Status: Registered

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. has secured multiple trademark registrations related to its iconic liver care line, including marks such as LIV-52, LIV-52 HD, LIV.52 PROTEC, LIV-52HB, Liv.52 HAEMOTEC, and ANIMAL FEED SUPPLEMENT (with device of animals), reflecting the brand’s extensive product portfolio and strong trademark strategy.

Court’s Decision

  • Court found deceptive similarity between ‘Liv.52’ & ‘Liv-333’.
    Rejected defendants’ claims of prior use & acquiescence.
  • Granted permanent injunction restraining the use of ‘Liv-333’.
  • Ordered removal of infringing products from all platforms.
  • Awarded ₹20 lakhs in damages & ₹10.91 lakhs as costs to the plaintiffs.

Significance

  • Reaffirms that brand reputation and consumer trust are legally protected.
  • Reinforces the scope of “deceptive similarity” under the Trademarks Act, 1999.
  • Sets a strong precedent against misuse of well-known trademarks.
    Emphasizes timely legal action in trademark disputes.

Key Takeaways

This judgment holds substantial relevance for India’s pharmaceutical & consumer healthcare sectors.

  • Reinforces Trademark Discipline: The court stressed the importance of following trademark laws, especially in sectors where brand identity influences consumer trust.
  • Protects Consumers: Underlines the court’s role in preventing confusion among buyers due to similar-looking products or brand names for same kind of product.
  • Supports Fair Competition: Encourages healthy competition but makes it clear that copying well-known marks crosses a legal line.
  • Brand Responsibility: Reminds big companies to protect their trademarks & smaller ones not to misuse established reputations.

Conclusion

The judgment in Himalaya Global Holdings vs. Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. represents a significant milestone in the progression of trademark protection & fair competition principles in India. It highlights the judiciary’s proactive role in safeguarding intellectual property & ensuring ethical business practices. This ruling is expected to act as a guiding precedent for upcoming trademark-related conflicts, offering insight into legal benchmarks & responsible corporate behavior in the market.

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. vs Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd.

References

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/03/19/delhi-high-court-30-lakh-costs-damages-himalaya-liv52-trademark-infringement-liv333-legal-news/

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/himalaya-liv52-medical-products-trademark-infringement-by-manufacturers-and-sellers-of-liv-333-products-286623

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/155557352/

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/03/19/delhi-high-court-30-lakh-costs-damages-himalaya-liv52-trademark-infringement-liv333-legal-news/17_himalaya-global-holdings-ltd-v-rajasthan-aushdhalaya-private-limited-2/

If you have any queries related to the Trademark search, please feel free to connect. At PATHtoIP LLP we ensure that every client receives exceptional results & insights through high-quality Intellectual Property research. As an experienced firm, we are dedicated to providing IP protection & delivering results capable of reaching your goals.

Contact Us

mapimg

Address:

Awfis Que Spaces Center, Seasons Mall, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, Pune

Phone:+91 98903 92620

Copyright © 2021-2026 PATHtoIP LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Concept, Design & Hosting by Saman Technosys Pvt. Ltd.