IP Nuggets

Trademark Infringement Case Study: Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. vs. Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd.

Trademark Infringement Case Study: Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd.  vs.  Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd.

Introduction

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. (Plaintiff)

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. is the parent company of Himalaya Wellness worldwide. It owns the trademarks & patents of Himalaya Wellness, which offers scientifically validated herbal solutions for the entire family. Himalaya is known for its trusted, head-to-heel wellness products rooted in Ayurveda & modern science.

Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. (Defendant)

Rajasthan Aushdhalaya is a renowned Ayurvedic brand, known for formulating, supplying, and exporting a wide range of herbal products. Using quality ingredients from trusted sources, their formulations are crafted to meet diverse wellness needs while staying true to traditional healing practices.

Case Summary

Case Overview

  • Case Title: Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. & Anr. vs Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
  • Court: Delhi High Court
  • Issue: Trademark infringement of ‘Liv.52’ & passing off using similar marks like ‘Liv-333’

Background

  • Himalaya adopted the ‘Liv.52’ mark for liver care products in 1955 & gained massive goodwill over the years.
  • Defendants were found selling ‘Liv-333liver care products using a logo & style allegedly similar to Himalaya’s.
  • Plaintiffs issued a cease-and-desist notice, but defendants continued the use.

  • Wordmark: LIV . 52
  • Proprietor: HIMALAYA GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.
  • Application Number: 180564
  • Class / Classes: 5
  • Status: Registered

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. has secured multiple trademark registrations related to its iconic liver care line, including marks such as LIV-52, LIV-52 HD, LIV.52 PROTEC, LIV-52HB, Liv.52 HAEMOTEC, and ANIMAL FEED SUPPLEMENT (with device of animals), reflecting the brand’s extensive product portfolio and strong trademark strategy.

Court’s Decision

  • Court found deceptive similarity between ‘Liv.52’ & ‘Liv-333’.
    Rejected defendants’ claims of prior use & acquiescence.
  • Granted permanent injunction restraining the use of ‘Liv-333’.
  • Ordered removal of infringing products from all platforms.
  • Awarded ₹20 lakhs in damages & ₹10.91 lakhs as costs to the plaintiffs.

Significance

  • Reaffirms that brand reputation and consumer trust are legally protected.
  • Reinforces the scope of “deceptive similarity” under the Trademarks Act, 1999.
  • Sets a strong precedent against misuse of well-known trademarks.
    Emphasizes timely legal action in trademark disputes.

Key Takeaways

This judgment holds substantial relevance for India’s pharmaceutical & consumer healthcare sectors.

  • Reinforces Trademark Discipline: The court stressed the importance of following trademark laws, especially in sectors where brand identity influences consumer trust.
  • Protects Consumers: Underlines the court’s role in preventing confusion among buyers due to similar-looking products or brand names for same kind of product.
  • Supports Fair Competition: Encourages healthy competition but makes it clear that copying well-known marks crosses a legal line.
  • Brand Responsibility: Reminds big companies to protect their trademarks & smaller ones not to misuse established reputations.

Conclusion

The judgment in Himalaya Global Holdings vs. Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. represents a significant milestone in the progression of trademark protection & fair competition principles in India. It highlights the judiciary’s proactive role in safeguarding intellectual property & ensuring ethical business practices. This ruling is expected to act as a guiding precedent for upcoming trademark-related conflicts, offering insight into legal benchmarks & responsible corporate behavior in the market.

References

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/03/19/delhi-high-court-30-lakh-costs-damages-himalaya-liv52-trademark-infringement-liv333-legal-news/

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/himalaya-liv52-medical-products-trademark-infringement-by-manufacturers-and-sellers-of-liv-333-products-286623

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/155557352/

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/03/19/delhi-high-court-30-lakh-costs-damages-himalaya-liv52-trademark-infringement-liv333-legal-news/17_himalaya-global-holdings-ltd-v-rajasthan-aushdhalaya-private-limited-2/

If you have any queries related to the Trademark search, please feel free to connect. At PATHtoIP LLP we ensure that every client receives exceptional results & insights through high-quality Intellectual Property research. As an experienced firm, we are dedicated to providing IP protection & delivering results capable of reaching your goals.

Contact Us

Address:

Awfis Que Spaces Center, Seasons Mall, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, Pune

Phone:+91 84119 35620 / +91 95455 88856

Copyright © 2024 PATHtoIP LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Concept, Design & Hosting by Saman Technosys Pvt. Ltd.

Disclaimer

Welcome to the website of PATHtoIP. As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I AGREE" button below, the website visitor agrees and acknowledges that: –

  • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of PATHtoIP or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.
  • The user wishes to gain more information about PATHtoIP for their own information and use.
  • All information about PATHtoIP on this website is being provided to the user only on their specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user's volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  • This website is a resource for informational purposes only and though intended, is not promised or guaranteed, to be complete or updated. PATHtoIP does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.
  • PATHtoIP assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained on this website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either express or implied.
  • The contents of this website do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. If you have any legal issues, you, in all cases, must seek independent legal advice.
  • PATHtoIP is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided on this website or through any external links thereon.
  • The information provided under this website is solely available at the user's request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.
  • All material and information (except any statutory instruments or judicial precedents) on this website is the intellectual property of PATHtoIP, and no part thereof shall be used, with or without adaptation, without the express prior written consent of PATHtoIP.